Antithrombotic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis and venous stents: an international registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with catheter-based thrombolysis and venous stenting, poststenting anticoagulant management is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy used in patients who have received venous stents for treatment of acute lower extremity DVT. METHODS: We created an international registry of patients with leg DVT from 2005 to 2019 who received venous stents as part of their acute management. We collected data on baseline clinical characteristics and pre-venous and post-venous stent antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: We studied 173 patients with venous stents: 101 (58%) were aged ≤50 years, 105 (61%) were female, and 128 (74%) had risk factors for thrombotic disease. DVT was iliofemoral in 150 (87%) patients, and catheter-based treatment was given within 7 days of diagnosis in 92 (53%) patients. After venous stenting, 109 (63%) patients received anticoagulant-only therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (29%), warfarin (22%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (10%), and 59 (34%) received anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy. In patients taking anticoagulant-only therapy, 29% received indefinite treatment; in patients on anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy, 19% received indefinite treatment. Factors associated with combined anticoagulant-antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulant-only therapy were use of thrombolytic, thrombectomy, and aspiration interventions (odds ratio [OR], 5.11; 95% CI, 1.45-18.05); use of balloon angioplasty (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.20-5.76); and immediate stent restenosis (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.45-5.89). CONCLUSION: Anticoagulant therapy without concomitant antiplatelet therapy appears to be the most common antithrombotic strategy in patients with DVT and venous stenting. More research is needed to determine outcomes of venous stenting in relation to antithrombotic therapy.

Development of a predictive model of venous thromboembolism recurrence in anticoagulated cancer patients using machine learning.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) show a high risk of VTE recurrence during anticoagulant treatment. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to assess the risk of VTE recurrence within 6 months at the moment of primary VTE diagnosis in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the EHRead® technology, based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML), the unstructured data in electronic health records from 9 Spanish hospitals between 2014 and 2018 were extracted. Both clinically- and ML-driven feature selection were performed to identify predictors for VTE recurrence. Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) algorithms were used to train different prediction models, which were subsequently validated in a hold-out data set. RESULTS: A total of 16,407 anticoagulated cancer patients with diagnosis of VTE were identified (54.4 % male and median age 70). Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and metastases were observed in 67.2 %, 26.6 %, and 47.7 % of the patients, respectively. During the study follow-up, 11.4 % of the patients developed a recurrent VTE, being more frequent in patients with lung cancer. Feature selection and model training based on ML identified primary pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, metastasis, adenocarcinoma, hemoglobin and serum creatinine levels, platelet and leukocyte count, family history of VTE, and patients' age as predictors of VTE recurrence within 6 months of VTE diagnosis. The LR model had an AUC-ROC (95 % CI) of 0.66 (0.61, 0.70), the DT of 0.69 (0.65, 0.72) and the RF of 0.68 (0.63, 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first ML-based predictive model designed to predict 6-months VTE recurrence in patients with cancer. These results hold great potential to assist clinicians to identify the high-risk patients and improve their clinical management.

Impact of emergency department management of isolated superficial vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: a secondary analysis of data from the ALTAMIRA study. / Impacto del manejo en urgencias en la evolución de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial aislada de miembros inferiores: subanálisis del estudio ALTAMIRA.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs in patients treated in Spanish hospital emergency departments (EDs). To evaluate the impact of ED management of venous thromboembolic complications on outcomes and to determine the characteristics of patients who develop complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective multicenter ALTAMIRA study (Spanish acronym for risk factors, complications, and assessment of Spanish ED management of SVT) used recorded data for consecutive patients with a diagnosis of isolated SVT treated in 18 EDs. We gathered data on symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or the extension or recurrence of SVT), clinically significant bleeding, and 180-day mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to explore variables associated with complications. RESULTS: A total of 703 patients were included. Anticoagulation was prescribed for 84.1% of the patients for a median of 30 days (interquartile range, 15-42 days); 81.3% were treated with low molecular weight heparin. A prophylactic dose was prescribed for 48% and an intermediate therapeutic dose for 52%. Sixty-four patients (9.2%) developed symptomatic thromboembolic disease within 180 days, 12 (1.7%) experienced clinically significant bleeding, and 4 (0.6%) died. Complications developed later in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy than in those not taking an anticoagulant (66 vs 11 days , P=.009), and 76.6% of those developing complications were not on anticoagulant when symptoms appeared. A history of thromboembolic disease was associated with developing complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.62). CONCLUSION: ED treatment of SVT varies and is often suboptimal. The incidence of thromboembolic complications after SVT is high. Starting anticoagulation in the ED delays the development of complications. Patients with a history of thromboembolic disease are more at risk of complications.

OBJETIVO: Describir el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial (TVS) aislada de miembros inferiores en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) españoles. Evaluar el impacto del tratamiento instaurado en urgencias en la evolución, en términos de complicaciones de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV), y conocer las características de los pacientes que sufren complicaciones. METODO: El estudio multicentrico (18 SUH) ALTAMIRA (fActores de riesgo, compLicaciones y evaluación del manejo de la TVS de Miembros Inferiores en hospitales españoles atendidos en los seRvicios de urgenciAs) creó un cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico objetivo de TVS aislada. Se recogieron las complicaciones de ETV sintomáticas (trombosis venosa profunda, tromboembolia pulmonar y extensión o recurrencia de TVS), sangrados clínicamente relevantes y defunciones a 180 días. Se evaluaron las variables asociadas a las complicaciones mediante una regresión de Cox. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 703 pacientes. El 84,1% recibieron anticoagulación durante 30 días (rango intercuartil 15-42), 81,3% con heparina de bajo peso molecular (48% dosis profilácticas, 52% intermedias-terapéuticas). En 180 días, 64 pacientes (9,1%) tuvieron complicación de ETV, 12 (1,7%) tuvieron sangrado clínicamente relevante, y 4 fallecieron (0,6%). Los pacientes en que se instauró anticoagulación en urgencias tardaron más tiempo en desarrollar complicaciones (66 vs 11 días, p = 0,009). El 76,6% de los que se complicaron no estaban anticoagulados en ese momento. La ETV previa se asoció de forma independiente con el desarrollo de complicaciones (hazard ratio ajustada 2,20; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1,34-3,62). CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento en urgencias de la TVS aislada es heterogéneo y con frecuencia subóptimo. La incidencia de complicaciones de ETV es elevada. El tratamiento anticoagulante iniciado en urgencias supone un retraso en el desarrollo de complicaciones. Los pacientes con ETV previa tienen más riesgo de complicaciones.

Impacto del manejo en urgencias en la evolución de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial aislada de miembros inferiores: subanálisis del estudio ALTAMIRA / Impact of emergency department management of isolated superficial vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: a secondary analysis of data from the ALTAMIRA study

Objetivos: Describir el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con trombosis venosa superficial (TVS) aislada de miembros inferiores en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) españoles. Evaluar el impacto del tratamiento instaurado en urgencias en la evolución, en términos de complicaciones de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV), y conocer las características de los pacientes que sufren complicaciones. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, multicéntrico (18 SUH), que incluyó pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico objetivo de TVS aislada. Se recogieron las complicaciones de ETV sintomáticas (trombosis venosa profunda, tromboembolia pulmonar y extensión o recurrencia de TVS), sangrados clínicamente relevantes y defunciones a 180 días. Se evaluaron las variables asociadas a las complicaciones mediante una regresión de Cox. Resultados: Se incluyeron 703 pacientes. El 84,1% recibieron anticoagulación durante 30 días (rango intercuartil 15-42), 81,3% con heparina de bajo peso molecular (48% dosis profilácticas, 52% intermedias-terapéuticas). En 180 días, 64 pacientes (9,1 %) tuvieron complicación de ETV, 12 (1,7%) tuvieron sangrado clínicamente relevante, y 4 fallecieron (0,6 %). Los pacientes en que se instauró anticoagulación en urgencias tardaron más tiempo en desarrollar complicaciones (66 vs 11 días, p = 0,009). El 76,6% de los que se complicaron no estaban anticoagulados en ese momento. La ETV previa se asoció de forma independiente con el desarrollo de complicaciones (hazard ratio ajustada 2,20; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1,34-3,62). (AU)

Objectives: To describe the management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs in patients treated in Spanish hospital emergency departments (EDs). To evaluate the impact of ED management of venous thromboembolic complications on outcomes and to determine the characteristics of patients who develop complications.Methods: The retrospective multicenter ALTAMIRA study (Spanish acronym for risk factors, complications, and assessment of Spanish ED management of SVT) used recorded data for consecutive patients with a diagnosis of isolated SVT treated in 18 EDs. We gathered data on symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or the extension or recurrence of SVT), clinically significant bleeding, and 180-day mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to explore variables associated with complications. Results: A total of 703 patients were included. Anticoagulation was prescribed for 84.1% of the patients for a median of 30 days (interquartile range, 15-42 days); 81.3% were treated with low molecular weight heparin. A prophylactic dose was prescribed for 48% and an intermediate therapeutic dose for 52%. Sixty-four patients (9.2%) developed symptomatic thromboembolic disease within 180 days, 12 (1.7%) experienced clinically significant bleeding, and 4 (0.6%) died. Complications developed later in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy than in those not taking an anticoagulant (66 vs 11 days , P=.009), and 76.6% of those developing complications were not on anticoagulant when symptoms appeared. A history of thromboembolic disease was associated with developing complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.62). (AU)

When and How to Use Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our objective is to describe currently available reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), their target population, the available clinical practice recommendations and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Specific (idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for direct factor Xa inhibitors) and non-specific (prothrombin complex concentrates) reversal agents are effective in neutralizing the anticoagulant effect of DOACs. New investigational antidotes such as ciraparantag and VMX-C001 offer an alternative to andexanet alfa in reversing the anticoagulant activity of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors, but more clinical data are needed before they could be licensed for use. Specific reversal agents are recommended for use in clinical situations within their licensed indications (i.e.: reversal of DOACs in patients with severe uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding or in need of emergency surgery or other invasive procedures), while non-specific reversal agents may be used when specific antidotes are not available or indicated.

Immunothrombosis: Molecular Aspects and New Therapeutic Perspectives.

Thromboinflammation or immunothrombosis is a concept that explains the existing link between coagulation and inflammatory response present in many situations, such as sepsis, venous thromboembolism, or COVID-19 associated coagulopathy. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current data regarding the mechanisms involved in immunothrombosis in order to understand the new therapeutic strategies focused in reducing thrombotic risk by controlling the inflammation.

Cancer Histology and Natural History of Patients with Lung Cancer and Venous Thromboembolism.

Background: In patients with lung cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), the influence of cancer histology on outcome has not been consistently evaluated. Methods: We used the RIETE registry (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes during anticoagulation in patients with lung cancer and VTE, according to the histology of lung cancer. Results: As of April 2022, there were 482 patients with lung cancer and VTE: adenocarcinoma 293 (61%), squamous 98 (20%), small-cell 44 (9.1%), other 47 (9.8%). The index VTE was diagnosed later in patients with squamous cancer than in those with adenocarcinoma (median, 5 vs. 2 months). In 50% of patients with adenocarcinoma, the VTE appeared within the first 90 days since cancer diagnosis. During anticoagulation (median 106 days, IQR: 45-214), 14 patients developed VTE recurrences, 15 suffered major bleeding, and 218 died: fatal pulmonary embolism 10, fatal bleeding 2. The rate of VTE recurrences was higher than the rate of major bleeding in patients with adenocarcinoma (11 vs. 6 events), and lower in those with other cancer types (3 vs. 9 events). On multivariable analysis, patients with adenocarcinoma had a non-significantly higher risk for VTE recurrences (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.79; 95%CI: 0.76-18.8), a lower risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.29; 95%CI: 0.09-0.95), and a similar risk of mortality (HR: 1.02; 95%CI: 0.76-1.36) than patients with other types of lung cancer. Conclusions: In patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the rate of VTE recurrences outweighed the rate of major bleeding. In patients with other lung cancers, it was the opposite.

EHA Guidelines on Management of Antithrombotic Treatments in Thrombocytopenic Patients With Cancer.

In cancer patients, thrombocytopenia can result from bone marrow infiltration or from anticancer medications and represents an important limitation for the use of antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic agents. These drugs are often required for prevention or treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis or for cardioembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation in an increasingly older cancer population. Data indicate that cancer remains an independent risk factor for thrombosis even in case of thrombocytopenia, since mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia does not protect against arterial or venous thrombosis. In addition, cancer patients are at increased risk of antithrombotic drug-associated bleeding, further complicated by thrombocytopenia and acquired hemostatic defects. Furthermore, some anticancer treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk and may generate interactions affecting the effectiveness or safety of antithrombotic drugs. In this complex scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology has produced this scientific document to provide a clinical practice guideline to help clinicians in the management of patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia. The Guidelines focus on adult patients with active cancer and a clear indication for anticoagulation, single or dual antiplatelet therapy, their combination, or reperfusion therapy, who have concurrent thrombocytopenia because of either malignancy or anticancer medications. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendations were discussed according to a Delphi procedure and graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

Long-Term Outcome of Critically Ill Advanced Cancer Patients Managed in an Intermediate Care Unit.

Background: To analyze the long-term outcomes for advanced cancer patients admitted to an intermediate care unit (ImCU), an analysis of a do not resuscitate orders (DNR) subgroup was made. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2006 to January 2019 in a single academic medical center of cancer patients with stage IV disease who suffered acute severe complications. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) was used as a prognostic and severity score. In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and survival after hospital discharge were calculated. Results: Two hundred and forty patients with stage IV cancer who attended at an ImCU were included. In total, 47.5% of the cohort had DNR orders. The two most frequent reasons for admission were sepsis (32.1%) and acute respiratory failure (excluding sepsis) (38.7%). Mortality in the ImCU was 10.8%. The mean predicted in-hospital mortality according to SAPS 3 was 51.9%. The observed in-hospital mortality was 37.5% (standard mortality ratio of 0.72). Patients discharged from hospital had a median survival of 81 (30.75−391.25) days (patients with DNR orders 46 days (19.5−92.25), patients without DNR orders 162 days (39.5−632)). The observed mortality was higher in patients with DNR orders: 52.6% vs. 23.8%, p 0 < 0.001. By multivariate logistic regression, a worse ECOG performance status (3−4 vs. 0−2), a higher SAPS 3 Score and DNR orders were associated with a higher in-hospital mortality. By multivariate analysis, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, higher bilirubin levels and DNR orders were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Conclusion: For patients with advanced cancer disease, even those with DNR orders, who suffer from acute complications or require continuous monitoring, an ImCU-centered multidisciplinary management shows encouraging results in terms of observed-to-expected mortality ratios.

[Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain]. / Síndrome de Trombosis con Trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española.

BACKGROUND: We describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) cases reported in Spain. METHODS: We included all venous or arterial thrombosis with thrombocytopenia following adenovirus vector-based vaccines (AstraZeneca or Janssen) to prevent COVID-19 disease between February 1st and September 26th, 2021. We describe the crude rate and the standardized morbidity ratio. We assessed the predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-one cases were reported and 45 fulfilled eligibility criteria, 82% women. The crude TTS rate was 4/1,000,000 doses and 14-15/1,000,000 doses between 30-49 years. The number of observed cases of cerebral venous thrombosis was 6-18 higher than the expected in patients younger than 49 years. Symptoms started 10 (interquartile range (IQR): 7-14) days after vaccination. Eighty percent (95% confidence interval (CI): 65-90%) had thrombocytopenia at the time of the emergency department visit, and 65% (95% CI: 49-78%) had D-dimer >2000 ng/mL. Patients had multiple location thrombosis in 36% and fatal outcome in 24% cases. A platelet nadir <50,000 /µL (odds ratio (OR): 7.4; CI 95%: 1.2-47.5) and intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 7.9; IC95%: 1.3-47.0) were associated with fatal outcome. CONCLUSION: TTS must be suspected in patients with symptoms 10 days after vaccination and thrombocytopenia and/or D-dimer increase.

Consenso multidisciplinar para el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón / Multidisciplinary Consensus for the Management of Pulmonary Thromboembolism

El objetivo del presente documento es actualizar el consenso previo publicado en 2013, en relación con 12 áreas controvertidas en el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón (TEP). Para cada área se realizó una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica y una propuesta de recomendación, sometida a un proceso de debate interno en dos teleconferencias sucesivas. En relación con el diagnóstico, recomendamos no utilizar la escala Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) de forma aislada para descartar la TEP y, cuando haya indicación de dímero D, recomendamos emplear un punto de corte ajustado a la edad. Sugerimos utilizar la angiotomografía computerizada de tórax como prueba de imagen para el diagnóstico de la mayoría de los pacientes con sospecha de la enfermedad. Se recomienda utilizar anticoagulantes de acción directa (en vez de antagonistas de la vitamina K) para el tratamiento de la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP, y se sugiere utilizar anticoagulación para la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP subsegmentaria. Se recomienda no colocar un filtro de vena cava inferior en la mayoría de los pacientes. Si se indica tratamiento de reperfusión, el panel recomienda utilizar fibrinolisis sistémica a dosis completas. La duración de la anticoagulación está condicionada principalmente por la presencia (o ausencia) y el tipo de factor de riesgo para enfermedad tromboembólica venosa, y recomendamos no realizar estudios de trombofilia para decidir la duración de la anticoagulación a la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP. Finalmente, sugerimos no realizar cribado extendido de cáncer oculto en pacientes con TEP. (AU)

We have updated recommendations on 12 controversial topics that were published in the 2013 National Consensus on the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). A comprehensive review of the literature was performed for each topic, and each recommendation was evaluated in two teleconferences. For diagnosis, we recommend against using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) rule as the only test to rule out PE, and we recommend using a D-dimer cutoff adjusted to age to rule out PE. We suggest using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as the imaging test of choice for the majority of patients with suspected PE. We recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (over vitamin K antagonists) for the vast majority of patients with acute PE, and we suggest using anticoagulation for patients with isolated subsegmental PE. We recommend against inserting an inferior cava filter for the majority of patients with PE, and we recommend using full-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy for PE patients requiring reperfusion. The decision to stop anticoagulants at 3 months or to treat indefinitely mainly depends on the presence (or absence) and type of risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and we recommend against thrombophilia testing to decide duration of anticoagulation. Finally, we suggest against extensive screening for occult cancer in patients with PE. (AU)

[Translated article] Multidisciplinary consensus for the management of pulmonary thromboembolism / Consenso multidisciplinar para el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón

We have updated recommendations on 12 controversial topics that were published in the 2013 National Consensus on the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). A comprehensive review of the literature was performed for each topic, and each recommendation was evaluated in two teleconferences. For diagnosis, we recommend against using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) rule as the only test to rule out PE, and we recommend using a d-dimer cutoff adjusted to age to rule out PE. We suggest using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as the imaging test of choice for the majority of patients with suspected PE. We recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (over vitamin K antagonists) for the vast majority of patients with acute PE, and we suggest using anticoagulation for patients with isolated subsegmental PE. We recommend against inserting an inferior cava filter for the majority of patients with PE, and we recommend using full-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy for PE patients requiring reperfusion. The decision to stop anticoagulants at 3 months or to treat indefinitely mainly depends on the presence (or absence) and type of risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and we recommend against thrombophilia testing to decide duration of anticoagulation. Finally, we suggest against extensive screening for occult cancer in patients with PE. (AU)

El objetivo del presente documento es actualizar el consenso previo publicado en 2013, en relación con 12 áreas controvertidas en el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón (TEP). Para cada área se realizó una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica y una propuesta de recomendación, sometida a un proceso de debate interno en dos teleconferencias sucesivas. En relación con el diagnóstico, recomendamos no utilizar la escala Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) de forma aislada para descartar la TEP y, cuando haya indicación de dímero D, recomendamos emplear un punto de corte ajustado a la edad. Sugerimos utilizar la angiotomografía computerizada de tórax como prueba de imagen para el diagnóstico de la mayoría de los pacientes con sospecha de la enfermedad. Se recomienda utilizar anticoagulantes de acción directa (en vez de antagonistas de la vitamina K) para el tratamiento de la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP, y se sugiere utilizar anticoagulación para la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP subsegmentaria. Se recomienda no colocar un filtro de vena cava inferior en la mayoría de los pacientes. Si se indica tratamiento de reperfusión, el panel recomienda utilizar fibrinolisis sistémica a dosis completas. La duración de la anticoagulación está condicionada principalmente por la presencia (o ausencia) y el tipo de factor de riesgo para enfermedad tromboembólica venosa, y recomendamos no realizar estudios de trombofilia para decidir la duración de la anticoagulación a la mayoría de los pacientes con TEP. Finalmente, sugerimos no realizar cribado extendido de cáncer oculto en pacientes con TEP.

CM-352 Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Anticoagulant-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the major devastating complications of anticoagulation. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibition has been proposed as a novel pharmacological approach for ICH treatment. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effects of CM-352 (MMP-fibrinolysis inhibitor) in an experimental ICH model associated with oral anticoagulants as compared with clinically used prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). METHODS: ICH was induced by collagenase injection into the striatum of wild type (C57BL/6J) anticoagulated mice (warfarin or rivaroxaban) and Mmp10 -/- mice. Hematoma volume and neurological deficits were measured 24 hours later by diaminobenzidine staining and different behavioral tests. Circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured in plasma samples and local inflammation was assessed by neutrophil infiltration. Finally, fibrinolytic effects of MMP-10 and rivaroxaban were evaluated by thromboelastometry and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) activation assays. RESULTS: Only PCC reduced hemorrhage volume and improved functional outcome in warfarin-ICH, but both PCC and CM-352 treatments diminished hemorrhage volume (46%, p < 0.01 and 64%, p < 0.001, respectively) and ameliorated functional outcome in rivaroxaban-ICH. We further demonstrated that CM-352, but not PCC, decreased neutrophil infiltration in the hemorrhage area at 24 hours. The effect of CM-352 could be related to MMP-10 inhibition since Mmp10 -/- mice showed lower hemorrhage volume, better neurological score, reduced IL-6 levels and neutrophil infiltration, and increased PAI-1 after experimental ICH. Finally, we found that CM-352 reduced MMP-10 and rivaroxaban-related fibrinolytic effects in thromboelastometry and TAFI activation. CONCLUSION: CM-352 treatment, by diminishing MMPs and rivaroxaban-associated fibrinolytic effects, might be a novel antihemorrhagic strategy for rivaroxaban-associated ICH.

Venous Thrombosis within 30 Days after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in a Multinational Venous Thromboembolism Registry.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE)-including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)-may occur early after vaccination against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We sought to describe the site, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of VTE after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: In a prospective study using the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) platform, patients with VTE 4-30 days after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (1 February 2021 through 30 April 2021) were included. VTE patients recruited from the same centers into RIETE in the same months in 2018-2019 were selected as the reference group. All-cause mortality and major bleeding were the main study outcomes. RESULTS: As of 30 April 2020, 102 patients with post-vaccination VTEs had been identified (28 after adenovirus-based vaccination [ChAdOx1 nCov-19; AstraZeneca] and 74 after mRNA-based vaccination [mRNA-1273; Moderna, and BNT162b2; Pfizer]). Compared with 911 historical controls, patients with VTE after adenovirus-based vaccination more frequently had CVST (10.7% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001) or thrombosis at multiple sites (17.9% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001), more frequently had thrombocytopenia (40.7% vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001), and had higher 14-day mortality (14.3% vs. 0.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 25.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-94.9) and major bleeding rates (10.3% vs. 1.0%, OR: 12.03, 95% CI: 3.07-47.13). The site of thrombosis, accompanying thrombocytopenia, and 14-day mortality rates were not significantly different for patients with VTE after mRNA-based vaccination, compared with historical controls. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with historical controls, VTE after adenovirus-based vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is accompanied by thrombocytopenia, occurs in unusual sites, and is associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Outcome of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism Is More Favorable among Patients with Hematologic Malignancies than in Those with Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with hematologic cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been consistently evaluated. We aimed to compare the rates of symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, or death during anticoagulant therapy in patients with VTE associated with hematologic versus solid cancers. METHODS: Consecutive patients with active cancer recruited in RIETE were evaluated. Their baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes during the course of anticoagulation were compared. Univariate and multivariate competing-risk analyses were performed. RESULTS: As of December 2020, 16,694 patients with cancer and VTE were recruited. Of these, 1,062 (6.4%) had hematologic cancers. Hematologic patients were less likely to initially present with pulmonary embolism (46 vs. 55%) and more likely with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (25 vs. 18%). They also were more likely to have severe thrombocytopenia at baseline (5.6 vs. 0.7%) or to receive chemotherapy (67 vs. 41%). During the course of anticoagulation (median, 150 vs. 127 days), 1,071 patients (6.4%) developed VTE recurrences, 806 (4.8%) suffered major bleeding, and 4,136 (24.8%) died. Patients with hematologic cancers had lower rates of recurrent VTE (rate ratio [RR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.95), major bleeding (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.98), or all-cause death (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.41-0.57) than those with solid cancers. Patients with multiple myeloma showed the best outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with hematologic cancers, particularly multiple myeloma, and VTE had better outcomes than those with solid cancers. These findings are relevant for the interpretation of previous clinical trials and the design of future studies.

Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy expert consensus opinion for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in onco-hematological patients.

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, different vaccines in front of SARS-CoV-2 have been approved and administered in different vulnerable populations. As patients with cancer were excluded from pivotal trials of vaccination, little is known on their immunogenic response to these vaccines, particularly in patients with severely impaired immune system. In response to that uncertainty, the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy launched an initiative aimed to provide recommendations for vaccination of the main hematological conditions. This document is based on the available information on COVID-19 outcomes, prior knowledge on vaccination in hematological patients, recent published data on serological response in oncohematological patients and expert opinions. New information about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination will be gathered in the near future, providing new scientific grounds to delineate the most adequate management of vaccination in patients with hematological diseases. The current limited data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hematological patients represents a major limitation of this expert consensus opinion. In fact, the speed in which this field evolves may reduce their validity in the near future.

Therapeutic versus Prophylactic Bemiparin in Hospitalized Patients with Nonsevere COVID-19 Pneumonia (BEMICOP Study): An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is mandatory, unless contraindicated. Given the links between inflammation and thrombosis, the use of higher doses of anticoagulants could improve outcomes. We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in adult patients hospitalized with nonsevere COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer. Patients were randomized to therapeutic-dose bemiparin (115 IU/kg daily) versus standard prophylaxis (bemiparin 3,500 IU daily), for 10 days. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, intensive care unit admission, need of mechanical ventilation support, development of moderate/severe acute respiratory distress, and venous or arterial thrombosis within 10 days of enrollment. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria). A prespecified interim analysis was performed when 40% of the planned study population was reached. From October 2020 to May 2021, 70 patients were randomized at 5 sites and 65 were included in the primary analysis; 32 patients allocated to therapeutic dose and 33 to standard prophylactic dose. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 7 patients (22%) in the therapeutic-dose group and 6 patients (18%) in the prophylactic-dose (absolute risk difference 3.6% [95% confidence interval [CI], -16% -24%]; odds ratio 1.26 [95% CI, 0.37-4.26]; p = 0.95). Discharge in the first 10 days was possible in 66 and 79% of patients, respectively. No major bleeding event was registered. Therefore, in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized with nonsevere pneumonia but elevated D-dimer, the use of a short course of therapeutic-dose bemiparin does not appear to improve clinical outcomes compared with standard prophylactic doses. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04604327.

Multidisciplinary Consensus for the Management of Pulmonary Thromboembolism. / Consenso multidisciplinar para el manejo de la tromboembolia de pulmón.

We have updated recommendations on 12 controversial topics that were published in the 2013 National Consensus on the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). A comprehensive review of the literature was performed for each topic, and each recommendation was evaluated in two teleconferences. For diagnosis, we recommend against using the Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) rule as the only test to rule out PE, and we recommend using a D-dimer cutoff adjusted to age to rule out PE. We suggest using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as the imaging test of choice for the majority of patients with suspected PE. We recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (over vitamin K antagonists) for the vast majority of patients with acute PE, and we suggest using anticoagulation for patients with isolated subsegmental PE. We recommend against inserting an inferior cava filter for the majority of patients with PE, and we recommend using full-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy for PE patients requiring reperfusion. The decision to stop anticoagulants at 3 months or to treat indefinitely mainly depends on the presence (or absence) and type of risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and we recommend against thrombophilia testing to decide duration of anticoagulation. Finally, we suggest against extensive screening for occult cancer in patients with PE.